Sam Parker murder trial, day 11: Closing arguments; jury begins deliberations
by Josh O'Bryant
Aug 31, 2009 | 4132 views | 13 13 comments | 28 28 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Parker trial: Defense's argument
Parker trial: Defense's argument
Parker trial: Prosecution's argument
Parker trial: Prosecution's argument
In day 11 of the Sam Parker murder trial, the defense and prosecution on Monday gave their closing arguments in a courtroom filled with about 100 onlookers.

After the closing arguments, the jury began deliberations about 3:30 p.m. They requested print photos from Sam Parker’s fishing trip with Bill Slack, which included shots of bruises on Sam Parker’s arms.

The jury also asked for additional evidence to be added, such as pictures of the outside area of the Parker residence at 985 Cordell Ave., pictures of Sam Parker’s truck and driveway, and pictures of under the house, including all transcripts. Judge Jon “Bo” Wood declined the request and told the jury that no other pieces of evidence would be added.

Judge Wood dismissed court for the day shortly before 5 p.m. The jury will return Tuesday morning for further deliberation.

The jury was told not to discuss, research or talk about the case.

Here's a look at the closing arguments:

Defense's closing argument

Public defender David Dunn was first to give his closing statement, which lasted about an hour and 10 minutes.

Dunn told the jury to consider the unusual circumstances in the case.

He said the prosecution doesn’t have the evidence to convict Sam and that the prosecu-tion had “done their job” for the government.

Dunn said that the state works for the government, but he, as a public defender, works for the individual.

Dunn said that this case has had him to defend law enforcement, which is something that is new to him.

“They want you to believe that Sam Parker is a rogue cop,” Dunn told the jury about the prosecution.

Dunn said that the late LaFayette Police Chief Charles “Dino” Richardson is not here to defend himself.

“I am talking about evidence,” Dunn said, and reiterated that the state does not have enough evidence on Sam, nor the right to prosecute Sam.

“We could try this case in three days and we could have,” Dunn said.

Dunn said the state’s witnesses were all scripted and rehearsed.

Dunn said Sam’s former wife Keila Beard never included the abuse from Sam in her di-vorce documents.

Dunn said that it is almost impossible to defend Sam, being confronted with all hearsay and no hard evidence.

Dunn said Beard only complained about Sam pulling over her daughter, post-divorce, and not of the abuse.

Dunn said he had trouble comprehending that many people had “remarkable and similar stories.”

“Everyone of these folks has been massaged, manipulated and scripted,” Dunn said.

Dunn said the state was getting what it wanted on Sam by “laying out morsels of meat and what people wanted to hear.”

Dunn questioned how the jury could take Ben Chaffin’s testimony seriously, because he constantly changed his story.

Dunn said that the state was “TMSLB” — “Trashing to Make Sam Look Bad.”

Dunn said that, other than Chaffin’s questionable testimony, there is no direct evidence of what happened to Theresa Parker.

“That is why they need Ben Chaffin so badly, because that is all they got,” Dunn said. “Sam has maintained his innocence since day one,” Dunn said.

Dunn said Chaffin’s April 2007 interview with the GBI was when he was “scripted” and a “deal” was made, so that if Chaffin “followed the script, he walks away clean.”

Dunn said that the insidious part was that now Chaffin faces perjury, because he “devi-ated from the script,” and that does not guarantee for the truth.

“I submit to you folks that Ben Chaffin is the least credible testimony to have ever been given in that chair,” Dunn said.

Dunn said that, when government wants to prosecute someone, the result is that they have “a lot of folks guilty.”

Dunn said that the traces of blood of Sam and Theresa found on the bumper of Theresa Parker’s Toyota Forerunner cannot be determined as to when and how long it had been there.

“There is not fact, but only opinions, “Dunn said.

Dunn said that Rhonda Knox’s testimony shows she was confusing the color of Theresa’s back cargo mat with her own, showing her testimony was manipulated.

Dunn said all of the evidence against Sam is circumstantial.

Dunn said Shane Green’s proof of involvement is proven by phone records of calls be-tween he and Theresa and the 300 extra miles he logged during his patrol shift from March 21-22.

Dunn said that, if the state looked further into Shane Green, more answers would be there, but the state did not want to look into it any further, because it would take away at the state’s theory.

Dunn said that Martha Lewis’ testimony of seeing two men, who she said was not Sam, was doubt enough not to convict Sam and that no one knows who the two men are.

Dunn said that the additional charges on Sam are there because the state needed some-thing to “fall back on.”

“Unless you are convinced, beyond a reasonable doubt…. then you have to acquit,” Dunn said. “Follow the law and find Sam Parker not guilty.”

Prosecution’s closing argument

After a short recess, district attorney Leigh Patterson gave a 58-minute closing statement to the jury.

Patterson started by saying there were three days the defendant had to kill, clean up af-ter and get rid of Theresa Parker’s body.

She said Sam took an oath as an officer and violated it and murdered his wife.

“He had 72 hours to clean up the crime scene and he knew how to did it,” Patterson said of Sam and his numerous experiences with working around crime scenes.

Patterson’s ran through a timeline of Theresa’s known actions until the time she disap-peared, noting that she was in constant talk with her family and that she was in the process of moving into a new apartment, ready to start her life over.

“I submit to you that Theresa Parker was a normal person,” Patterson said.

Patterson said there has not been any activity on Theresa’s bank account and she has not contacted anyone since she disappeared.

“We submit to you that Theresa Parker is dead” and Sam Parker murdered her, Patterson said.

Patterson asked the jury to use common sense on the defense’s theories.

She said that Martha Lewis’ testimony of seeing two other men at the Parker residence the day Theresa went missing is not reasonable. Patterson said Lewis actually saw Cody and Sam.

Patterson then moved on to Shane Green’s involvement. Patterson said Shane Green did not kill Theresa Parker and he did not have an affair with her.

Patterson referred to Dunn calling Sam a “character” and Patterson said, “He (Sam) is a cockroach who runs when you turn the lights on.”

Patterson said Theresa went to Gatlinburg to relax, before she would later tell her hus-band she wanted a divorce and that she was leaving him.

“She had a few days of peace,” Patterson said.

Patterson said Theresa would later go home to tell her husband that she was leaving him and Patterson said, “Ladies and gentlemen, nobody leaves Sam Parker.”

Patterson told the jury about Sam investigating Theresa’s whereabouts, whom she may or may not been with in Gatlinburg, that “fuels” Sam’s paranoia that leads to her death.

Patterson said Sam hid the reservation receipt copy that was faxed by Black Bear Lodge to him (under his phony investigation) in her mail for her to find and calls her a “whore,” then he calls “everyone in Walker County” to question whom she might be seeing.

“In his mind she has betrayed him and there is not one shred of evidence that Theresa Parker was unfaithful to that man,” Patterson said.

Patterson recalls Virginia Cordell’s video deposition, in which Virginia said Sam told her, “If she (Theresa) would come outside, I would shoot her in the head,” referring to a conversation Sam had with Virginia about the reservation at the Black Bear Lodge.

Patterson said Sam’s phone calls were signaling off the LaFayette cell phone tower and that, on the late hours of March 21, he went home to “drink some liquid courage” and called Theresa at 12:45 p.m., luring her back home with a “false sense of security,” and then Sam called Christy Bellflower.

Patterson said that the next time anyone has a track on Sam was when Bellflower called him and he did not answer and that the time between 12:45 p.m. and 1:25 a.m. was unac-counted for Sam and his whereabouts.

Patterson said it took Sam 45 minutes to kill Theresa and he used her Toyota Forerun-ner’s back cargo mat to absorb the blood. He went by Bellflower’s as an alibi, all while Theresa Parker’s body is in the back of her Forerunner, she said.

Patterson said that Sam then called Chaffin and let Bellflower talk to him to cover his al-ibi.

Patterson said Sam lied to Bill Slack and that the time he was getting ready for fishing, he switched from the Forerunner, because he still had to get rid of her body and that Theresa’s body is somewhere at that time between LaFayette and Trion.

She said by 6 a.m. Sam already had her phone and was looking for the supposed guys whom she “betrayed him with.”

Patterson said Theresa’s phone, at this time, was bouncing off the Summerville tower (by records) around 6 a.m. when Rhonda Knox was calling her.

Patterson said Sam then cleaned up the Forerunner of her remains and vacuumed the back and got rid of the back cargo mat.

Patterson asked the jury why anyone would clean a vehicle while moving and that inves-tigators noticed that the back of the SUV was cleaned, but not the front part.

Patterson said that while Sam (5 days later) went to the hospital for a dislocated hip, it was from moving Theresa’s body and that testimonies were made about the scratches and bruises on Sam and she asked for the jury to use common sense, especially since he is saying “My dead wife, my dead wife.”

Patterson said that in Sam’s mind, he thinks, “If she was betraying him, then it’s her fault.”

Patterson then began to go over every action that witnesses testified about Sam’s threats and abuse, by starting off each one with saying, “This is the guy who ….”

Patterson reminded the jury that the reason Theresa’s family and Sam’s ex-wife did not call the police was “because, as they said, he was the police.”

Patterson ended by saying that Sam was the person Theresa Parker would come home to every night and that Theresa was almost out of the situation with Sam and was starting her life over again in a peaceful way.

Patterson asked the jury to “give her the peace she so desperately wanted.”

comments (13)
« VWN wrote on Wednesday, Sep 02 at 07:32 AM »
justagirlinga......

I'm in total agreement with you on several factors. I've always said IF Theresa is deceased and IF she is anywhere in the area, she's UNDER highway 27. As far as contacting her family, who knows? Sam likes to talk, but talk is talk. Is he capable of doing something like this? I believe, given the right set of circumstances anyone is. Do I think he did it? Looking at the past, he certainly has a rather violent history, but the fact still remains that there's really NO HARD PROOF. This case is going to set precedent, whichever way it goes. As far as ANY man laying his hands on ANY woman, there is absolutely no excuse for that to happen. It would take a low-life piece of $%^& to even consider hitting or hurting a woman under ANY circumstances. If a man is being assaulted by a woman, I'm sure he can always find a door to walk out of. If Sam DID kill Theresa, he needs to pay and pay dearly. But, if we're going to leave him in the hands of our justice system, the rules of evidence need to be followed, and the proof just isn't there.

VWN
« justagirlinga wrote on Wednesday, Sep 02 at 04:17 AM »
VWN,

I agree with you, there's no body. So there is doubt that she is even dead. I have doubted it many times, he was abusive so she could have skipped town to get away from him, but wouldn't she atleast contact her family who so desperately is wanting to find her? It is 100% true what you are saying it is HARD to convict a person of murder when there is no evidence of a murder. But, Sam openly admited to a lot of people he knew, that he in fact knew how to hide a body and he could get by with it if he wanted to. Granted, that is not a confession, nor does that mean he would actually do it, but it does look a little suspicious. He's a cop and he knows procedure and he knows how to get rid of a crime scene. There's no evidence because he was smart about it. If Theresa just wanted to get away from him she could, they had no children so there was nothing to tie her to him except for possible death threats. There may not be any hardcore evidence against him, but a person's actions and demeanor can tell you a lot. I just hope if he did murder her that he gets punished for it.

I have never heard anyone's theories on what he might have done with her.. but I thought they said something about they pinged her cellphone between LaFayette and Trion.. does anyone find it possible he could have done something with her when the big HWY 27 road construction was going on? It was right around the same time they were paving and digging up the old hwy... just a thought.
« fairydust28 wrote on Tuesday, Sep 01 at 08:21 PM »
I know that everyone say's you need a body to convict of murder but acording to Sam Parkers statements you WILL NOT EVER FIND THE BODY. Sam Parker made that statement to several and to two of his wives. I guess he finally did just that what he had been saying. I just want Sam Parker to know and anyone else that it takes ONE COWARD OF A MAN TO KILL A HELPLESS WOMAN any woman for that matter.
« SueLeonard wrote on Tuesday, Sep 01 at 02:47 PM »
Personally I think Sam is guilty as sin. I knew him 12 years ago when I lived in LaFayette and he bragged about being able to hide a body where no one could find it. It seemed to be something he liked to brag about to anyone who would listen. Sam and his nutty mouth was the main reason I left that town. He scared me!
« BRUCErulz wrote on Tuesday, Sep 01 at 11:41 AM »
I have read, studied, commented on, examined, discussed and digested this case since I first saw the LE gathering at Corinth Baptist Church on March 24th. I have talked with numerous LE off the record and I have listened to a thousand and one theories about what happened to TP. I consider myself as informed on this case as the next citizen. Bottom line... I no longer believe in the Local justice system. I no longer have faith in the locally elected officials and I have lost a great deal of respect for local LE. Local= STATEWIDE. The way this case was handled is an embarrassment to everyone. Pure BS. TT
« innwga wrote on Tuesday, Sep 01 at 11:05 AM »
from the the website http://www.nobodymurdercases.com/

Making a case for conviction

Deric Rothe/Auburn Journal

Suzanne Gazzaniga tells Auburn Rotary Club members Tuesday about the intensive effort by local law enforcement and the Placer County District Attorney’s Office that led to the conviction of Paul Kovacich Jr. for the 1982 murder of his wife Janet. Gazzaniga and her prosecution team created a timeline and calendar outlining Janet and Paul Kovacich’s daily and hourly whereabouts shortly before and after the homicide. “The trial came down to re-creating bit by bit what happened in September 1982,” she said. Despite facing long odds and having no body, no weapon, no crime scene, no indisputable cause of death, no eye witnesses and no confession, Gazzaniga and the Placer District Attorney’s team won a conviction. She was recently named a statewide Prosecutor of the Year for her efforts.
« innwga wrote on Tuesday, Sep 01 at 11:00 AM »
How can you convict someone of murder, first of all, if there is no body >>>>>

http://www.nobodymurdercases.com/
« ga72 wrote on Tuesday, Sep 01 at 10:07 AM »
To everyone that has been posting comments..please remember that in order to prove someone guilty of a crime you need hard evidence..you need to show without a doubt this man is guilty. Have they done that? Can you honestly say the prosecution has proven without a doubt that Sam is guilty? I'm not saying he is or isn't..however if I were a juror there is no way I could convict this man when there is no hard evidence proving he murder Theresa. All testimony has been hear say or slandering from years past. Innocent until proven guilty...unfortuantely everyone has assumed him guilty way before the trial starter..Where is the justice in that. The entire situation is terrible....I think the sheriffs dept. police dept detectives jumped to soon on arresting Sam...it appears not enough was done in this case. They needed to point the finger in order for the family and community to feel as though something was being done. All I'm saying is ... don't be so quick to judge.
« VWN wrote on Tuesday, Sep 01 at 09:48 AM »
justagirlinga......

You may be right about Sam. Then again, you may not be. How can you convict someone of murder, first of all, if there is no body. Secondly, no crime scene. Thirdly, no murder weapon. Show some evidence Theresa is indeed dead. How can you convict someone of murder if you can't prove beyond a reasonable doubt the "victim" of the supposed crime is dead? Now don't get all bent out of shape, because Sam probably is guilty. I'll give you that much. But, to put it simply, the proof is in the pudding, and the puddin' ain't on the table. There's no hard evidence indicating either Theresa is dead or if so, that Sam killed her. I'll be surprised if a guilty verdict comes in. We can speculate all we want, but I believe if we were all honest, we would have to say the prosecution hasn't proven their case. A few more hours and we should know something. Hope for the best and deal with the worst.

VWN
« justagirlinga wrote on Tuesday, Sep 01 at 06:40 AM »
I think the little looney bin trip should explain enough.. he is a sick and twisted individual and if the jury cannot see that then I do not know what to think.

Everyone is questioning why his ex-wife nor Theresa didn't call the cops on him when he started the abuse... obviously these people have never seen movies. Do they honestly believe the police would believe someone over a cop. They'd just say his wives were mad at him and wanted revenge. I think they need to go ahead and lock him up and get it over with.. before he ruins someone elses life. Theresa deserves her peace and justice. There is too much common sense evidence to say he is not guilty.. I mean look at his face in the courtroom, he acts like he could care less. His face is empty. If he didn't kill Theresa then don't you think he'd atleast look like he didn't. He looks as if he is thinking, "Is it lunch time, yet?"

I wonder if he will confess and tell them where her body is after he gets convicted?
« wildmoon wrote on Tuesday, Sep 01 at 01:21 AM »
I would like to say that it is sad that the court will not allow all evidence to be entered. In this case anything that could be used to posibly help solve this case should be entered for the jury to examine. I also think that it is ashame that all the focas is on Shane Green and and his call's with Theresa (what about Mr.Parker and all his call's to Ms. Bellflower.)What about those? Why hasnt anyone asked that question? I also think that the dislocated hip came from Theresa fighting back for her life with Sam Parker and if the doctor who examined Parker was asked I think that they would agree it would take some force to dislocate a hip. I wish that this court would really take a long look at this and see that it is clear that he is guilty and i truly think that's why the other evidence was not allowed to be used because it would convict Sam Parker. I also wonder if Sam was at Bellflowers home to call Chaffin for an aliby with Treasa's body in the back of her fourunner and she knew about then does that make Bellflower guilty as well? I just want justice for Treasa she was just wanting to be happy and move on she did not deserve this please give her justice and her family.
« innwga wrote on Monday, Aug 31 at 10:26 PM »
Ever wonder why the defense only had Mr Greene phone records for the month of March? Why not February? January? Maybe because it will show that they didn't talk everyday and hurt their case even more. Plus she was moving and most people knew she would be busy packing and not have the time to talk. On the defense questioning on which way Mr Greene drove to the Parker house that one morning really didn't matter either. I live in that area years ago and the time frame is the same either way you go, about seven minutes from the bypass and 136 to the house. Dino isn't here to get Sam out of this like he did many time before. Sam had a lot of time to get his story straight and clean the place up. On TP cell phone, He knew he had to destroy it when it rang that morning, That's why he said to check it for a ping from the towers ... he knew it wasn't going to help so why not suggest it?

Lawyers will tell you to say not guilty even if you did do it, there always a chance you may go free.
« geno36 wrote on Monday, Aug 31 at 05:22 PM »
Is it just me or does it seem strange that Mr Greene just stopped calling TP on the 19th. 3 days before she was reportd missing. Seeing how they were good friends and all, and how he talked to here everyday up till then. Sounds like there may be quite a few higher ups involved in her dissaperance or that doesn't want the truth coming out. Maybe that she had more going on than everyone knew about. Better check those closets again.Just might find a few more skeletons.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at the our discretion.